Edu Impact Alliance

Transitions and Wellbeing: The First Ten Minutes That Set the Day

Teach the choreography - start, model and handover - so confidence rises and anxiety falls.

Challenge

Pupils moving between phases and rooms felt unsettled; wellbeing concerns spiked at lesson transitions.

Result

Shared starts, rehearsed handovers and tutor check‑ins calmed rooms and reduced referrals.

Outcome

More learning time, higher confidence and a warmer climate for pupils who needed it most.

Innovation

Common retrieval starts, named handovers, two‑minute tutor check‑ins and parent guides with plain language.

Brief overview

Anxiety lives in uncertainty. We taught the choreography of lessons so pupils always knew the first step. Predictable routines plus quick support improved both learning and wellbeing.

Mechanisms that move practice

Teachers opened with retrieval, then a clean model. Tutors rehearsed handovers. Leaders visited five‑minute slices and left one keep, one try.

Human moments that matter

A pupil who usually waited began first because the step was obvious. A parent felt reassured by a short, clear plan in plain English.

Keeping workload net zero

Shared formats, scripts and travelling notes reduced duplication. Meetings focused on artefacts, not reports.

Evidence and alignment

We counted time to settled work, tracked referrals around transitions and sampled models in books. Pupil voice captured confidence.

Impact

Settling time fell, wellbeing referrals reduced and teachers moved to practice sooner.

Lessons for leaders and investors

  • Teach the start and the handover.
  • Check in briefly, often.
  • Use artefacts for review.
  • Measure small signals that move fast.

Full Article

What this means for school leaders and investors

Transitions and Wellbeing: The First Ten Minutes That Set the Day is a reminder that belonging and safety are preconditions for learning. The surface story is familiar: leaders are asked to improve outcomes, protect wellbeing and keep the organisation financially credible, all at once. The deeper issue is whether a school can turn big ideas into small, repeatable acts that pupils experience every day.

For leaders, this means choosing fewer priorities, defining the classroom behaviours that show those priorities are real, and then protecting staff time so the work is sustainable. A plan that reads well but cannot be enacted in a normal week creates cynicism, and cynicism spreads quickly.

For boards and investors, the best question is not 'Do we have a strategy?' but 'Do we have a routine?'. Evidence should include artefacts such as model lessons, common resources, coaching logs and clear decision points, not only narrative updates.

Full narrative expansion

In practice, successful schools describe the problem with precision before they reach for a programme. They agree what will improve, for whom, and how they will know. This avoids the common trap of launching a new initiative that feels busy but does not change teaching.

The strongest narratives are not heroic. They are operational. Leaders build routines for modelling, rehearsal and follow up, and they create simple artefacts that make quality easier to repeat. They also define non-negotiables so staff are not left guessing what matters most.

This is where a practical lens is helpful. It asks: what does the teacher do at 8.55 on a wet Tuesday? What do pupils do? What do leaders look at in the first five minutes of a visit? If those answers are clear, the rest of the story is likely to hold.

What changed in practice

Inclusion is made real through predictable routines and responsive support. Transitions succeed when pupils know the start, the model is clean, and handovers are rehearsed. Wellbeing improves when tutors check in briefly and often, and when parents receive clear guidance in plain English. Both require operational detail, not just policy.

A recurring pattern is the choice to teach fewer things more deeply. Schools that try to cover everything produce shallow compliance. Schools that choose a handful of priorities and protect rehearsal time produce mastery. This discipline is hard. It requires leaders to say no to attractive distractions and to defend staff time against low‑value asks.

Evidence is also operational. It includes artefacts such as lesson models, retrieval decks, pupil work samples, and coaching notes. It avoids abstract scores that are slow to move and hard to interpret. It answers the question: did the thing we rehearsed appear in practice? Did it make a visible difference to pupils? If the answer is unclear, the routine needs refining.

Human moments that build culture

Real change is visible in small moments. A pupil who hesitated now begins work immediately because the start is predictable. A parent feels reassured because the plan is short and written in plain language. A new teacher grows in confidence because the handover script is shared and the coaching is supportive. These moments are not dramatic but they are unmistakable. They show that the system is working.

Results

Time to settled work fell from eight minutes to three. Wellbeing referrals around lesson changes dropped. Teachers reported higher confidence and warmer relationships, especially with pupils who needed structure most.

Workload and sustainability

Time was protected by reusing formats and retiring low‑value tasks. Shared scripts reduced preparation. Travelling notes replaced repeated explanations. Coaching happened inside existing meetings, not as an add‑on. The operating system was explicit: this is what we rehearse, this is what we retire, and this is how we know it worked.

Evidence and rigour

The approach aligns with DfE guidance on behaviour, SEND and safeguarding, Ofsted's Education Inspection Framework, and KCSIE principles. Evidence came from time‑to‑task observations, referral data, work samples and pupil voice. Small signals moved quickly and informed adjustments before problems compounded.

Sources and further reading

Selected links to expand on the themes in this article.